![]() ![]() ![]() Siegel shows extensively that if it’s traumatic, we may very well notremember it coherently. Siegel’s work suggests that the Times best go back to science school. Harvard’s Lisa Najavits called McNally’s statement “disappointing… landing too forcefully on one side…by no means an end to the debate.” Bessel van der Kolk for speaking of “repressed memories.” If it’s traumatic, we remember it, period, the Times says “Harvard psychologist Richard McNally called the idea of repressed memories ‘the worst catastrophe to befall the mental health field since the lobotomy’.” But many of McNally’s peers said his allegation wasn’t proven. ĭan Siegel is sooo relevant to the May 22 New York Times’ dig against Dr. “You sent us a brain in the mail !” Anderson Cooper exclaims in this Sept. Siegel flies around the world trying to alert parents and others about how childhood experiences affect the brain. My cholesterol would still be over 240, my kidneys headed for failure.īut in March 2011, I clicked on the wrong link in a friend’s email and ended up watching a Dan Siegel webinar on how the brain works in trauma. ![]() I’d be unaware of my childhood attachment trauma, unable to feel my past, dissociated, and miserable with anxiety. ![]() Without them, I’d still be a successful, all-head talk technical writer for Pentagon sales. Siegel, MD (far left) introduced me to brain science, and I write about brain scientists like him ‘cos they saved my life. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |